App Status Dashboared - Research & Redesign

App Status Dashboard - Research & Redesign

App Status Dashboard - Reseach & Redesign

App Status Dashboard - Reseach & Redesign

App Status Dashboard - Reseach & Redesign

App Status Dashboard - Reseach & Redesign

Researching and redesigning the application status dashboards

Researching and redesigning the application status dashboards

Researching and redesigning the application status dashboards

Researching and redesigning the application status dashboards

Brightspeed's UOC website homepage with navigation tabs, “Welcome to UOC” heading, and various service options.
Brightspeed's UOC website homepage with navigation tabs, “Welcome to UOC” heading, and various service options.
Brightspeed's UOC website homepage with navigation tabs, “Welcome to UOC” heading, and various service options.
Brightspeed's UOC website homepage with navigation tabs, “Welcome to UOC” heading, and various service options.

I conducted in-depth research did a full overhaul for the application status dashboards, which were causing a significant number of user issues.

Client:

Progress Residential

My Role:

UX Researcher & Designer

Year:

2025

THE CHALLENGE

THE CHALLENGE

At the dashboard stage, almost half of applicants abandoned the process. Without clear status updates or next steps, they missed deadlines, failed to complete payments, and ultimately turned to support for help.

At the dashboard stage, almost half of applicants abandoned the process. Without clear status updates or next steps, they missed deadlines, failed to complete payments, and ultimately turned to support for help.

The Human Impact:

  • Frustration with basic tasks.

  • Can’t complete intended actions.

  • Often call support for information that should be self-service.

The Human Impact:

  • Frustration with basic tasks.

  • Can’t complete intended actions.

  • Often call support for information that should be self-service.

The Business Impact:

  • 48% drop-off at a critical conversion point.

  • Support team overwhelmed with preventable calls about status and next steps.

  • Revenue loss from qualified applicants giving up in frustration.

The Business Impact:

  • 48% drop-off at a critical conversion point.

  • Support team overwhelmed with preventable calls about status and next steps.

  • Revenue loss from qualified applicants giving up in frustration.

RESEARCH

RESEARCH

Understanding the problem

Understanding the problem

Research Methods:

  • Analyzed user behavior and drop off patterns, utilizing tools like Full Story.

  • Conducted a UX audit of the current dashboard(s) experience.

  • Researched comparable experiences and best practices for status tracking.

Research Methods:

  • Analyzed user behavior and drop off patterns, utilizing tools like Full Story.

  • Conducted a UX audit of the current dashboard(s) experience.

  • Researched comparable experiences and best practices for status tracking.

Research Goals:

  • Understand why 48% of applicants are dropping off

  • Identify specific pain points causing support calls

  • Discover root causes behind user confusion

  • Find opportunities to enable self-service

Research Goals:

  • Understand why 48% of applicants are dropping off

  • Identify specific pain points causing support calls

  • Discover root causes behind user confusion

  • Find opportunities to enable self-service

Core UX Problems

  • Poor status communication: Leaving applicants unsure of their progress in the journey

  • Blocked payment flow: Applicants unable to access payment options through this dashboard

  • Layout Hierarchy: Critical information (ex: Deadline) is buried and competing for attention

  • No clear next steps: Applicants left guessing for what actions to take next

  • Not actionable: Providing little to no assitance for users trying to check their status and progress in the journey

Next Steps Dashboard

Screenshot of google device comparison table.

App Status Dashboard

Screenshot of apple's device comparison chart.

User Behavior Evidence (Full Story Sessions Recap)

  • High amount dead clicks on home description card: This was especially prevelent when the status changed to "Pay". It indicates that users recognized action needed to be taken, but were unsure how to do it.

  • High time on page with no actions taken: Applicantds were scanning and clicking around the dashboard trying to get more information or trying to take action but never really being able to.

  • Continuous refreshing while viewing dashboard: Applicants would come to these dashboards and continuously refresh the page hoping to see a change in their status.

Screenshot of apple's device comparison chart.

Communication Breakdown: Beyond UX

System-Wide Problems

  • Over-reliance on email: Important info (e.g., payment links, next steps) is only accessible via email.

  • Email dependency failures: Important emails can be missed by applicants, hindering progress.

  • Disconnected experience: Dashboards showed incomplete picture of the application status.

  • Missing urgency indicators: Deadlines and time-sensitive actions not clearly communicated.

THE CURRENT EXPERIENCE

THE CURRENT EXPERIENCE

Next Steps Dashboard

Next Steps Dashboard

Key Problems Identified

  • Users struggled to understand their progress in the journey.

  • Competing information lacks clear importance hierarchy.

  • Payment is blocked until all applicants complete their application.

  • Payment link is sent via email and is no where to be found on this page.

  • Deadline lacks emphasis.

User Impact

  • 48% drop-off from the application journey

  • User confusion when attempting to make required payments.

  • Users unable to complete the actions they came to the dashboard to do.

Screenshot of google device comparison table.
Screenshot of google device comparison table.

Application Status Dashboard

Application Status Dashboard

Key Problems Identified

  • The progress tracker is low on the page and is not clearly prioritized.

  • No feedback on system-side tasks. (ex: background check in progress)

  • Doesn’t reinforce user momentum.

  • Little to no actionable elements.

User Impact

  • Users unable to understand their current application state.

  • No clear path forward after checking status.

  • Forced to seek information elsewhere (contacting support)

SOLUTION

SOLUTION

Address the root causes identified in research through targeted UX improvements

Core Solutions

  • Make application status crystal clear.

  • Enable self-service actions.

  • Reduce reliance on email.

  • Create clear information hierarchy.

  • Combine the two dashboards into one cohesive experience.

Design Principles

  • Clarity over completeness

  • Action-oriented

  • Self-service first

  • Mobile-optimized

Clear Status Communication

Clear Status Communication

Added a prominent status bar and a full Application Process Overview with an estimated completion time. These features give users clarity on what’s completed, what’s in progress, and what’s ahead. The result is reduced anxiety, increased trust, and a stronger sense of control.

Creating an Actionable Dashboard

Creating an Actionable Dashboard

Redesigned the dashboard to be more actionable by surfacing key tasks like paying the application fee directly on the page, eliminating the need to dig through emails or call support. I also improved the co-applicant process by allowing users to edit information and send reminders, giving them greater control and reducing friction.

Information Architecture

Information Architecture

Redesigned the information architecture to prioritize clarity and action. Key elements like the Progress Tracker, deadlines, and “What’s Next” are now prominently displayed at the top of the page, creating a clear visual hierarchy that guides users and eliminates confusion from the previous design.

Combining Dashboards

Combining Dashboards

Combined the segmented dashboards into a single, streamlined experience. The unified dashboard creates one source of truth for application information, making the process more intuitive, consistent, and user-friendly.

FINAL SCREENS

FINAL SCREENS

Project Reflection

Project Reflection

Project Reflection

Project Reflection

What went well:

  • Got time for thorough research and user insights before designing.

  • Using tools like Full Story to watch how users interact with the dashboard, find their pain points, and get valuable insights to shape dashboard improvements.

What went well:

  • Got time for thorough research and user insights before designing.

  • Using tools like Full Story to watch how users interact with the dashboard, find their pain points, and get valuable insights to shape dashboard improvements.

What didn’t go so well

  • Despite initial redesign plans, business priorities shifted, preventing testing and implementation of improvements.

What didn’t go so well

  • Despite initial redesign plans, business priorities shifted, preventing testing and implementation of improvements.